RAG Implementation Strategy & Roadmap

๐Ÿ“‹ Current Implementation Status

๐Ÿ” Quick Assessment:

  • Implementation: Working RAG system with JSON storage (internal/rag/)

  • Knowledge Base: 351KB knowledge.json with 351 documents from 3 PDFs

  • Source Data: 16MB of PDF documents in kb/ directory

  • Integration: Fully operational with Slack MCP client and custom prompts

  • Performance: Already experiencing scalability challenges at current size

๐Ÿ“Š Real Usage Data:

$ ls -la knowledge.json kb/
-rw-r--r--  1 user  staff  360938 Jun 29 13:22 knowledge.json  # 351KB
drwxr-xr-x  5 user  staff     160 Jun 29 13:22 kb/
$ ./slack-mcp-client --rag-search "market demand" | wc -l
# Returns 5 documents with good relevance

๐Ÿšจ Immediate Challenges:

  • JSON file already 351KB with just 3 PDFs - demonstrating scalability issues

  • Memory usage growing linearly (all 351 documents loaded on startup)

  • Search performance degrading as knowledge base grows

  • No deduplication (risk of ingesting same PDFs multiple times)

โœ… What's Working Well:

  • Successful LLM integration (custom prompts working)

  • Proper MCP tool registration and discovery

  • PDF processing pipeline functional

  • Multi-word search with basic scoring

  • Production deployment already validated


๐ŸŽฏ Strategic Roadmap Overview

Current State: Ultra-Simplified RAG โœ… COMPLETED

  • Architecture: JSON storage with MCP tool integration

  • Performance: Good for <1K documents, 351 documents currently

  • Implementation: ~250 lines of Go code

  • Status: Completed โœ…

  • Performance: 100x faster search, supports 50K+ documents

  • Memory: Independent of document count (<50MB regardless of size)

  • Compatibility: Backward compatible API, auto-migration from JSON

  • Scope: Moderate effort, significant performance improvement

Future Phases: Advanced Features ๐Ÿ”ฎ OPTIONAL

  • Semantic Search: Vector embeddings for similarity matching

  • Enterprise Features: Access control, audit logging, monitoring

  • Multi-format Support: DOCX, HTML, markdown, etc.

  • Scope: Additional phases as requirements evolve


๐Ÿ“ˆ Performance Evolution Path

Phase
Document Capacity
Memory Usage
Search Speed
Implementation Effort

Current (JSON)

~1,000 docs

100MB+ (linear)

O(n) scan

โœ… Complete

SQLite FTS5

50,000+ docs

<50MB (indexed)

O(log n)

Moderate

Vector Search

100,000+ docs

<100MB

O(log n) semantic

Advanced

Enterprise

Unlimited

Configurable

<100ms

Complex


๐ŸŽฏ Immediate Priorities

Quick Wins (Immediate)

  1. Text file support - Expand beyond PDF-only

  2. Duplicate detection - Content hashing to prevent re-ingestion

  3. Better search scoring - Word proximity and relevance ranking

  4. Metadata filtering - Search by file type, date, etc.

Performance Fix (Next Priority)

SQLite Migration - The critical upgrade needed for real scalability:

  • Problem: Current 351KB JSON shows scalability cliff approaching

  • Solution: SQLite FTS5 provides enterprise-grade search performance

  • Benefit: 100x faster search, unlimited document capacity

  • Risk: Low - backward compatible with automatic migration


๐Ÿ›  Implementation Strategy

Philosophy: Evolutionary Architecture

  • Start Simple: Current JSON approach proved the concept โœ…

  • Upgrade When Needed: SQLite when hitting performance limits (now)

  • Maintain Compatibility: API stays consistent across all phases

  • Zero Downtime: Migrations preserve existing functionality

Risk Mitigation

  • Incremental Changes: Each phase is fully functional

  • Automatic Migration: One-command upgrade from JSON to SQLite

  • Rollback Support: Keep JSON as fallback option

  • API Stability: Interface remains consistent

Success Metrics

  • Phase 1 (Current): โœ… Functional RAG integration

  • Phase 2 (SQLite): Support 50K+ docs with <100ms search

  • Phase 3 (Advanced): Semantic search with >80% relevance

  • Phase 4 (Enterprise): Production monitoring and security


๐Ÿ“š Documentation Structure

Document
Purpose
Audience

High-level strategy and roadmap

Decision makers, architects

Detailed SQLite migration plan

Developers, implementers

User guide for current system

End users, operators


๐Ÿš€ Next Steps

  1. Review Current Performance: Monitor JSON file size and search latency

  2. Plan SQLite Migration: Review detailed implementation in rag-sqlite.md

  3. Implement Quick Wins: Start with text file support and duplicate detection

  4. Schedule Migration: Plan SQLite upgrade when performance becomes critical

The current system works well but is approaching scalability limits. SQLite migration is the recommended next major upgrade for sustained growth.

Last updated

Was this helpful?