SQLite RAG Implementation & Migration Plan
Overview
A comprehensive migration plan from the current JSON-based RAG system to a high-performance SQLite implementation with FTS5 full-text search. This upgrade addresses scalability limitations while maintaining backward compatibility.
SQLite Migration Architecture
Key Improvements Over JSON Implementation
Performance Gains
Search Speed: O(log n) FTS5 indexing vs O(n) linear scan
Memory Usage: <50MB regardless of document count vs linear growth
Document Capacity: 50,000+ documents vs ~1,000 practical limit
Query Performance: <100ms search time vs degrading performance
Feature Enhancements
Advanced Search: Boolean operators (AND, OR, NOT), phrase matching
Faceted Search: Filter by file type, date range, source
Relevance Scoring: BM25 ranking algorithm built into FTS5
Pagination: Efficient offset/limit for large result sets
LangChain Go Integration Analysis
Based on research of the LangChain Go ecosystem, here are the available SQLite integration options:
Option 1: Direct SQLite Integration β RECOMMENDED
Advantages:
Zero LangChain Dependencies: Use standard
database/sqlwith SQLite driverFull Control: Direct SQL queries, custom schema design, optimal performance
Mature Ecosystem:
github.com/mattn/go-sqlite3is the standard Go SQLite driverFTS5 Support: Built-in full-text search with SQLite FTS5 extension
Implementation:
Option 2: LangChain Go SQLite Memory + Custom Vector Store
Status: CONFIRMED - LangChain Go has limited SQLite support
Available in LangChain Go:
β SqliteChatMessageHistory (
github.com/tmc/langchaingo/memory/sqlite3)β SQL Database Toolkit (general SQLite database operations)
β NO SQLite Vector Store (not available in LangChain Go)
Hybrid Approach:
Option 3: Third-Party Go Vector Libraries
Alternative Libraries:
chand1012/vectorgo- Pure Go SQLite-powered vector databaseCustom Implementation - Build vector similarity search on top of SQLite
Advantages:
Specialized: Purpose-built for vector operations
Go Native: No Python dependencies
Recommendation: Pure Go Implementation
For this project, Option 1 (Direct SQLite) is recommended because:
Existing Pattern: Current JSON implementation is custom, not LangChain-dependent
Performance Focus: Direct SQL access provides optimal performance
Full Feature Control: Can implement exactly the features needed
Maintenance: Fewer dependencies, easier to debug and maintain
LangChain Go Limitations: No vector store support for SQLite
Database Schema Design
Implementation Architecture
Core Components
Advanced Search Implementation
Migration Strategy
Backward Compatibility Interface
Configuration Migration
CLI Commands Enhancement
Performance Optimizations
Database Tuning
Batch Operations
Monitoring & Analytics
Future Extensions
Advanced Features Ready for Implementation
Vector Embeddings: Add embedding column for semantic search
Multi-tenant: Namespace isolation with tenant_id
Real-time Sync: File watching and incremental updates
Backup/Restore: Automated backup procedures
Replication: Master-slave setup for high availability
Integration Points
Slack Bot: Enhanced search commands with filters
Web UI: Management interface for document lifecycle
API Server: RESTful endpoints for external integration
Monitoring: Prometheus metrics and health checks
This SQLite implementation provides a solid foundation for enterprise-scale RAG while maintaining the simplicity and integration patterns of the original JSON approach.
Last updated
Was this helpful?