SQLite RAG Implementation & Migration Plan

Overview

A comprehensive migration plan from the current JSON-based RAG system to a high-performance SQLite implementation with FTS5 full-text search. This upgrade addresses scalability limitations while maintaining backward compatibility.

SQLite Migration Architecture

Key Improvements Over JSON Implementation

Performance Gains

  • Search Speed: O(log n) FTS5 indexing vs O(n) linear scan

  • Memory Usage: <50MB regardless of document count vs linear growth

  • Document Capacity: 50,000+ documents vs ~1,000 practical limit

  • Query Performance: <100ms search time vs degrading performance

Feature Enhancements

  • Advanced Search: Boolean operators (AND, OR, NOT), phrase matching

  • Faceted Search: Filter by file type, date range, source

  • Relevance Scoring: BM25 ranking algorithm built into FTS5

  • Pagination: Efficient offset/limit for large result sets

LangChain Go Integration Analysis

Based on research of the LangChain Go ecosystem, here are the available SQLite integration options:

Advantages:

  • Zero LangChain Dependencies: Use standard database/sql with SQLite driver

  • Full Control: Direct SQL queries, custom schema design, optimal performance

  • Mature Ecosystem: github.com/mattn/go-sqlite3 is the standard Go SQLite driver

  • FTS5 Support: Built-in full-text search with SQLite FTS5 extension

Implementation:

Option 2: LangChain Go SQLite Memory + Custom Vector Store

Status: CONFIRMED - LangChain Go has limited SQLite support

Available in LangChain Go:

  • βœ… SqliteChatMessageHistory (github.com/tmc/langchaingo/memory/sqlite3)

  • βœ… SQL Database Toolkit (general SQLite database operations)

  • ❌ NO SQLite Vector Store (not available in LangChain Go)

Hybrid Approach:

Option 3: Third-Party Go Vector Libraries

Alternative Libraries:

  • chand1012/vectorgo - Pure Go SQLite-powered vector database

  • Custom Implementation - Build vector similarity search on top of SQLite

Advantages:

  • Specialized: Purpose-built for vector operations

  • Go Native: No Python dependencies

Recommendation: Pure Go Implementation

For this project, Option 1 (Direct SQLite) is recommended because:

  1. Existing Pattern: Current JSON implementation is custom, not LangChain-dependent

  2. Performance Focus: Direct SQL access provides optimal performance

  3. Full Feature Control: Can implement exactly the features needed

  4. Maintenance: Fewer dependencies, easier to debug and maintain

  5. LangChain Go Limitations: No vector store support for SQLite

Database Schema Design

Implementation Architecture

Core Components

Advanced Search Implementation

Migration Strategy

Backward Compatibility Interface

Configuration Migration

CLI Commands Enhancement

Performance Optimizations

Database Tuning

Batch Operations

Monitoring & Analytics

Future Extensions

Advanced Features Ready for Implementation

  • Vector Embeddings: Add embedding column for semantic search

  • Multi-tenant: Namespace isolation with tenant_id

  • Real-time Sync: File watching and incremental updates

  • Backup/Restore: Automated backup procedures

  • Replication: Master-slave setup for high availability

Integration Points

  • Slack Bot: Enhanced search commands with filters

  • Web UI: Management interface for document lifecycle

  • API Server: RESTful endpoints for external integration

  • Monitoring: Prometheus metrics and health checks

This SQLite implementation provides a solid foundation for enterprise-scale RAG while maintaining the simplicity and integration patterns of the original JSON approach.

Last updated

Was this helpful?